Posts Tagged ‘Health’

Dear readers, I’m sorry for my long absence, but unfortunately I need to read more and more in order to publish something original and overall interesting. Today I just want to give you some informations about the swine flu, claimed to be a pandemy from the World Health Organization on 11 Jun 2009.

The situation updates is available here: we talk about data presented in the last update on 6 Jul 2009. It is easy to estimate that only the 0.45% of infected humans, unfortunately, died.

But pollution, for example, causes the 40% of human deaths: that’s a pandemy, but unfortunately nobody does anything to solve the problem. So, why is the swine flu  pandemic? Probably because it is higly infectious and contagious. It should not be a problem after all: someone will produce a vaccine, and we will be able to choose to get it or not.

There is a problem. Just another one. Unfortunately we won’t be free to choose to get it: we will have to do it otherwise we will be considered legally like terrorists. The vaccine will be mandatory. Why? Prisonplanet.com writes:

The question is, what will happen to the millions of people around the world who will reject the notion that the government can order someone to stick a needle in your arm by force?

A concerned citizen called the the Arkansas State Health Department for advice on what he could do to opt out of the vaccine only to be told that mandatory vaccines were constitutional and could be enforced at gunpoint by the government if necessary.

One of his main concerns centered around the fact that the company chosen to mass produce the swine flu vaccine, Baxter International, were recently caught in a scandal after it emerged they had sent out vaccines contaminated with the H5N1 avian flu virus to 18 countries from their Austrian branch. It was only by providence that the contamination was found after the batch was first tested on ferrets in the Czech Republic, before being shipped out for injection into humans. The ferrets all died and the shocking discovery was made.

Some Czech newspapers speculated at the time that Baxter was embroiled in a conspiracy to provoke a pandemic from which it would reap billions in profits from producing the vaccine to counter a bird flu outbreak.

As we have previously covered, the last time the government ordered a mass vaccination drive in response to a swine flu outbreak, the program had to be stopped short after the shots caused over 500 cases of Guillain-Barre syndrome, a severe paralyzing nerve disease. 30 people died as a direct result of the vaccinations.

As with every flu virus, the particular strain of swine flu currently circulating the globe will inevitably mutate and change, and indeed there is evidence to suggest that this is already taking place – so how on earth could vaccines be a fix all cure unless multiple vaccines produced on an annual basis were distributed?

Ahhhh….now we’re beginning to see the full picture.

Since the corporate media is owned by the same interests that control the pharmaceutical companies, who by the way will stand to profit in the billions and even trillions if a policy of mandatory vaccination is enforced, it is no wonder why the fearmongering is intensifying as we draw closer to the timeframe that officials promised us all along would mark the return of swine flu with a vengeance – along with the mass rollout of vaccines that some people will be less enthusiastic about than others.

Wow. It doesn’t sound good, isn’t it? We report another article, about the swine flu in 1976 in USA:

Steve Watson
Infowars.net
Friday, April 24, 2009

Given the reports of possibility of a swine flu epidemic, it is interesting to note that last time there was a significant outbreak of a new form of swine flu in the U.S. it originated at the army base at Fort Dix, New Jersey.

Hundreds of soldiers on the base, mostly recruits, were infected without becoming ill in 1976.

President Gerald Ford immediately ordered a nationwide vaccination program.

More than 40 million people were vaccinated. However, the program was stopped short after over 500 cases of Guillain-Barre syndrome, a severe paralyzing nerve disease, were reported. 30 people died as a direct result of the vaccinations.

Here there is a video about the swine flu propaganda in the USA on 1976:

It loks like Psychological terror. Our question: Why? We don’t want to be conspired, but this story looks something like that. We want to end this post with a video, from Dr. Rima E. Laibow from Heatlh Freedom, about this events. Actually there is an campaign against forced mandatory vaccines. We consider Dr. Laibow a valid and informed scientific source about this topic: you can see her CV here.

We hope in your comments, to know what you think about the truth behind the swine flu pandemy.

Advertisements

The Kassandra Project

big-pharma.png

Americans are being treated as human guinea pigs. They are being assaulted by dangerous combinations of pharmaceutical company drug residue that passes from human waste into our taps and bottled water. But why? In the short run, Big Pharma’s goal is to slowly sicken us for profit. They create dependency on their cures and vaccines for the illnesses they have engineered. The long-run agenda is systematic global population reduction.

Big Pharma, the EPA, and municipal water authorities have attempted to suppress information regarding the pollution of drinking water. This AP article provides the disturbing details.

A vast array of pharmaceuticals — including antibiotics, anti-convulsants, mood stabilizers and sex hormones — have been found in the drinking water supplies of at least 41 million Americans.

Water providers rarely disclose results of pharmaceutical screenings, unless pressed, the AP found. For example, the head of a group representing major California suppliers said the public “doesn’t know how to interpret the information” and might be unduly alarmed.

Why bother informing the affected public? You assume they are too stupid to handle the truth anyway. Thank you Big Water spokesman for wanting to protect the citizens from information that might “alarm” them. I am sure many are easily agitated and tend to get violent when corporations and the government try to poison them.

But most treatments do not remove all drug residue. Recent studies — which have gone virtually unnoticed by the general public — have found alarming effects on human cells and wildlife.

The studies have gone “virtually unnoticed” due to the government’s attempt to keep the citizens shielded from the truth.

“We recognize it is a growing concern and we’re taking it very seriously,” said Benjamin H. Grumbles, assistant administrator for water at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

No, you are not taking the threat seriously Benjamin. You only said that because your criminal negligence has been exposed.

water-pollution.jpg

Here are some of the key test results obtained by the AP:

_In Philadelphia, sixty-three pharmaceuticals or byproducts were found in the city’s watersheds.

_A sex hormone was detected in San Francisco’s drinking water.

_The drinking water for Washington, D.C., and surrounding areas tested positive for six pharmaceuticals.

The situation is undoubtedly worse than suggested by the positive test results in the major population centers. The federal government doesn’t require any testing and hasn’t set safety limits for drugs in water.

Maybe the lack of testing for drugs in our water has something to do with the soldiers from the pharmaceutical corporations who have a powerful lobbying influence and write the legislation and EPA regulations. Just a wild guess of course.

City water officials declined repeated requests for an interview. In one statement, they insisted that “New York City’s drinking water continues to meet all federal and state regulations regarding drinking water quality in the watershed and the distribution system” — regulations that do not address trace pharmaceuticals.

In several cases, officials at municipal or regional water providers told the AP that pharmaceuticals had not been detected, but the AP obtained the results of tests conducted by independent researchers that showed otherwise.

The officials only want to protect the people from being “unduly alarmed.” We cannot handle the truth. We might march on Washington and clamor for safe drinking water. What is the harm in a little white lie when the social order will be maintained?

Arlington, Texas, acknowledged that traces of a pharmaceutical were detected in its drinking water but cited post-9/11 security concerns in refusing to identify the drug. Officials in Emporia, Kan., refused to answer AP’s questions, also citing post-9/11 issues.

It is better that Big Pharma and the complicit government poison us than the evil “terrorists.” If the crazy Muslim fundamentalists knew what drugs were in our drinking water, they would assuredly destroy our way of life. They hate us because of our “freedoms”.

Even users of bottled water and home filtration systems don’t necessarily avoid exposure. Bottlers, some of which simply repackage tap water, do not typically treat or test for pharmaceuticals, according to the industry’s main trade group. The same goes for the makers of home filtration systems.

In other words, get used to taking your daily cocktail of other’s peoples drugs. There is nothing you can do about it anyway, so why worry?

Pharmaceuticals also permeate aquifers deep underground, source of 40 percent of the nation’s water supply. Federal scientists who drew water in 24 states from aquifers near contaminant sources such as landfills and animal feed lots found minuscule levels of hormones, antibiotics and other drugs.

Another issue: There’s evidence that adding chlorine, a common process in conventional drinking water treatment plants, makes some pharmaceuticals more toxic.

Ask the pharmaceutical industry whether the contamination of water supplies is a problem, and officials will tell you no. “Based on what we now know, I would say we find there’s little or no risk from pharmaceuticals in the environment to human health,” said microbiologist Thomas White, a consultant for the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America.

“Based on what we now know” – which is virtually nothing since the data is purposefully suppressed. Certainly a consultant for Big Pharma would provide a thoroughly objective analysis of the dangers posed by drugs in the water supply. It is not like his paycheck depends on it or anything.

But at a conference last summer, Mary Buzby — director of environmental technology for drug maker Merck & Co. Inc. (soon to be unemployed) — said: “There’s no doubt about it, pharmaceuticals are being detected in the environment and there is genuine concern that these compounds, in the small concentrations that they’re at, could be causing impacts to human health or to aquatic organisms.”

Recent laboratory research has found that small amounts of medication have affected human embryonic kidney cells, human blood cells and human breast cancer cells. The cancer cells proliferated too quickly; the kidney cells grew too slowly; and the blood cells showed biological activity associated with inflammation.

Also, pharmaceuticals in waterways are damaging wildlife across the nation and around the globe, research shows. Notably, male fish are being feminized, creating egg yolk proteins, a process usually restricted to females. Pharmaceuticals also are affecting sentinel species at the foundation of the pyramid of life — such as earth worms in the wild and zooplankton in the laboratory, studies show.

Some scientists stress that the research is extremely limited, and there are too many unknowns. They say, though, that the documented health problems in wildlife are disconcerting.

“It brings a question to people’s minds that if the fish were affected … might there be a potential problem for humans?” EPA research biologist Vickie Wilson told the AP. “It could be that the fish are just exquisitely sensitive because of their physiology or something. We haven’t gotten far enough along.”

Sounds like it requires further study Vickie. In the meantime, we should freely imbibe our chemical cocktails and roll the dice. I mean it is just our health right? Besides, who wants to live forever? Screw the animals and environmental impact.

There’s growing concern in the scientific community, meanwhile, that certain drugs — or combinations of drugs — may harm humans over decades because water, unlike most specific foods, is consumed in sizable amounts every day.

Our bodies may shrug off a relatively big one-time dose, yet suffer from a smaller amount delivered continuously over a half century, perhaps subtly stirring allergies or nerve damage. However, some experts say medications may pose a unique danger because, unlike most pollutants, they were crafted to act on the human body.

“We know we are being exposed to other people’s drugs through our drinking water, and that can’t be good,” says Dr. David Carpenter, who directs the Institute for Health and the Environment of the State University of New York at Albany.

Maybe you should not be so worried about this news. I am sure that the elected officials, and their political agency appointees, recognize the importance of protecting every American’s health and safety. I am sure that measures to keep our water safe are being implemented as I type this.

gen-jack-ripper.jpg

General Jack D. Ripper: You know when fluoridation first began?
Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: I… no, no. I don’t, Jack.
General Jack D. Ripper: Nineteen hundred and forty-six. Nineteen forty-six, Mandrake. How does that coincide with your post-war Commie conspiracy, huh? It’s incredibly obvious, isn’t it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That’s the way your hard-core Commie works.

Share Kassandra Project feed:Subscribe Kassandra Project

The Kassandra Project

, , , , , , , , , ,

The Kassandra Project

rfid.jpg

In this article, the International herald Tribune details how Metro Group, a retail chain in Germany, is placing small chips in garments that will communicate radio signals by way of portable readers. This technology (known as RFID) uses a tag that can be used for tracking or identifying the carrier. Currently, RFID technology is utilized in passports, shipment tracking, animals, libraries, retail store loyalty cards, and as reported here, human beings (to track medical records).

The rapidly expanding use of this technology has far-reaching and damaging consequences for individual privacy and freedom from governmental (and non-governmental) surveillance. There are many compelling reasons that individuals should fear this insidious technology, including the heightened risk of identity theft, privacy violations, detrimental health consequences, and the Globalist’s aim to brand humans like barnyard chattel.

RFID technology will soon be employed on a global scale for the purpose of monitoring every living being. Even if the RFID chips are not placed on the person, their attachment to clothes (and other personal articles) will allow for constant indirect monitoring of the individual. This surveillance promotes the constant fear of a snoop looking over your shoulder, and if left unchecked, will result in the erosion of privacy rights and individual autonomy. Though many security protection measures have been implemented to protect privacy, they will be eroded over time through reverse engineering or legislative measures that invalidate their protections.

In late February, the European Commission issued privacy protection proposals to establish a code of conduct for companies using RFID technology. The guidelines will be open to public comment and debate through late April. They will stop short of becoming part of actual legislation, instead offering direction to members of the European Union for developing privacy protections.

The European Union is feigning meaningful interest in the advancement of RFID technology. The public comments and concerns will only be used in an advisory capacity, and as a result, without legal effect. The EU is a testing ground for the massive implementation of this technology for individual tracking on a global scale.

The goal of the Globalists is to monitor your every movement, compile extensive files on your purchasing habits, and to erode any expectation of privacy that you may once have harbored. Their aim is to destroy the notion of individuality and personal freedom, thereby consigning humans to the control and direction of their collectivist handlers.

What can you do to thwart the Globalist’s agenda to violate your fundamental human rights?

  • Keep passports in a remote location (i.e., bank safe deposit box)
  • Provide false information on store loyalty cards
  • Closely scrutinize medical form waivers that may include RFID provisions
  • Reject attempts by veterinarians to place RFID chips in your animals
  • Do not check books or publications out of libraries
  • Avoid manufacturers or clothiers who employ this technology
  • Keep yourself informed

Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen ~ Zbigniew Brzeziński (Former U.S. National Security Advisor and foreign policy advisor to Barack Obama)

Share Kassandra Project feed:Subscribe Kassandra Project

The Kassandra Project

, , , , , , , ,